Yoga for chronic pain and hypermobility, what the evidence actually shows

About
Latest Posts

Adam Foster is the founder of The Fibro Guy and one of the leading voices in hypermobility, EDS, and chronic pain rehabilitation. A former Reconnaissance Soldier, he developed chronic pain after an IED blast in Afghanistan and built his approach from the ground up when the medical system had no answers. Since 2009 he has worked with thousands of people across eight countries, drawing on pain neuroscience, motor learning, and sensorimotor rehabilitation. He co-authored "No Pain, No Pain" with trauma psychologist Dr Mairi Harper, directed the documentary "Invisible Monster," and has been featured in Forbes, BBC Radio 4, ITV News, LiveScience, and The Telegraph.

Where yoga actually came from

The yoga you picture, with the leggings and the downward dog and the hour of flowing postures, is a fairly recent thing, and that surprises a lot of people when they first hear it. Yoga as a tradition is genuinely ancient. It began on the Indian subcontinent, and the word itself comes from the Sanskrit root “yuj”, meaning to yoke or unite. But for most of its history, the physical postures were a minor part of the whole. Almost a footnote tucked behind the rest of the practice.

If you go back to the premodern texts, what you find is a practice built around breath control, drawing the senses inward, concentration, and meditation ^[2]. Posture (asana) was there, but it mostly meant a steady, comfortable seat you could hold while you did the real work, which was inside your head, not in your hamstrings. The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali, conventionally dated to roughly the early centuries CE, describe asana in barely a line or two, as a stable seat for meditation, and that’s about it, no sun salutations, no warrior poses, none of the stuff a modern class is built around.

So how did we get from “sit still and breathe” to a global fitness phenomenon worth billions? The posture heavy, health and fitness version of yoga that spread around the world largely took shape in the 20th century. It absorbed a surprising amount from European physical culture, from gymnastics, and from the early women’s exercise movements of the day. It was also shaped in part by Indian nationalism’s wish to project strength and health to the world. A lot of what feels timeless and eastern in a modern studio has fingerprints from early 1900s European gym culture all over it ^[1].

This point gets overstated, however, so a word of care here. It’s tempting to say “modern yoga postures were invented in the 20th century and made up out of nothing”. But that’s too strong. The scholarship has pushed back on it for some time, because many seated, supine, arm balancing, and inverted postures do have older Indian precedents in regional texts well before colonial contact. So the more accurate version is that modern postural yoga is a selective, reframed subset of a much older and broader tradition, given a heavy 20th century makeover rather than conjured out of thin air. That’s a distinction worth bothering with if you care about getting it right ^[1]^[3].

The lineage is worth knowing, because it explains why the class down your road looks the way it does. T. Krishnamacharya taught in Mysore in the early to mid 20th century, and gets called the father of modern yoga, which is handy shorthand and not much more than that. His students are the names you’ll recognise. B.K.S. Iyengar, all precision and props and being told off about the angle of your back foot, K. Pattabhi Jois, with the fast sweaty Ashtanga stuff, and then the hot, heated room style people lump together as Bikram, which comes off a different branch again. So when you walk into a studio and it’s either dead slow with a block under everything or relentless and dripping, that’s not some unbroken thousand year recipe, it’s the personality of a handful of 20th century teachers who taught very differently from one another ^[1].

And why does any of this matter when you’re the one in pain? It changes how you’re allowed to think about yoga. It isn’t some sacred medicine handed down intact from the ancients, untouchable and above questioning, it’s a movement practice, and people built it, rebuilt it, borrowed bits, dropped bits, much the same way most good things happen. But it does mean we get to ask it the same blunt question we’d ask of any other exercise, which is, does it work, for who, and how much.

What the research says about yoga in general

So what does yoga actually do to a body? We’ve got plausible ideas rather than proof. The proposed explanations keep landing on the same handful. Turning down the body’s stress response, which is the HPA axis that drives cortisol. Lowering cortisol itself. And nudging up the calm, rest and digest side of the nervous system, including heart rate variability, which is a marker of that calmer state.

It sounds convincing on the surface. The snag is that most of those are proposed mechanisms rather than nailed down ones. So the fair version reads something like this. Yoga blends movement, breath, and a bit of attention in a way that plausibly tips you towards a calmer gear. It’s a reasonable story, but not a settled fact. Anyone who tells you, hand on heart, that yoga “resets your nervous system” is running a fair way past what the data can back ^[8].

Back pain, yoga’s strongest hand

Yoga has a flagship condition, and that’s ongoing low back pain, which is where its evidence base sits at its strongest. A Cochrane review of yoga for chronic non specific low back pain found small to moderate gains in back related function and pain against not exercising, and against other forms of exercise, little or no difference, with the certainty rated as low to moderate. A newer and well run trial then ran a twelve week virtual yoga programme, which beat a wait list on both pain intensity and function, with the gains still holding at six months and no serious harms reported ^[5]^[9].

Read those two together and the real headline is duller than the marketing but more useful. For long term low back pain, yoga works about as well as other exercise, better than doing nothing at all, but not magic, and what it really amounts to is exercise in a format some people enjoy and stick with, and the sticking with it is half the point. Our piece on fibromyalgia and exercise makes the same broader case, which is that the best exercise is very often the one you’ll keep doing.

Mood, the heart, and where it gets weaker

Beyond the back the picture thins. When it comes to mood, the evidence is real but softer. For depression, pooled trials point to a moderate short term drop in symptoms against usual care, which is worth something. But the studies carry real methodological weaknesses, and yoga sits best as an add on rather than a standalone treatment. So, helpful alongside other things, short term, modest certainty, and not a replacement for proper mental health care ^[6].

On the heart the claims thin further still. When the evidence for yoga in heart disease was reviewed, the most on offer was a weak recommendation for yoga as an optional extra in conditions like coronary heart disease and heart failure, with very low to low certainty and no proven effect on whether people actually live longer. That last bit gets dropped in the marketing version, which is a shame, because yoga has not been shown to reduce deaths from heart disease, and any claim that strong deserves to be treated with suspicion ^[7].

Pull all of this up to the big picture and the field lands where it usually does. A recent umbrella review, which is a review of reviews across many chronic conditions, found that yoga tends to help across a wide range of problems, while the certainty of the underlying evidence is frequently low ^[4]. So that’s the honest one line summary of yoga as general exercise. Probably helpful, often pleasant, rarely harmful in gentle forms, propped up by an evidence base that’s broad but not deep, and a fair distance from the marketing version of itself.

How much, and is it safe?

People always want a dose. I get the question almost every week, normally phrased something like “how many classes do I need to do, like minimum”, and the honest answer is that the dose response data are limited and depend heavily on the condition. The trials that showed benefit for back pain tended to run around eight to twelve weeks of regular practice, which is a reasonable rule of thumb. I’d be wary of anyone quoting a precise “minimum dose”, though, because the evidence doesn’t support that level of precision ^[5]^[9].

Safety is where the general yoga story starts bleeding into the hypermobility story. A national survey of yoga practitioners found that most yoga related adverse events are musculoskeletal and minor, which is reassuring on the face of it, with pulled muscles and sore joints and the odd tweak being the usual culprits. But acute injuries do happen, they happen more with intense practice and in people who already have something going on in a joint, and that’s the bridge to the part of this post that matters most for our readers ^[10].

Yoga versus tai chi versus Pilates

This is the question that lands in our inbox most weeks. Yoga, tai chi, or Pilates, which one’s best? People want a winner, and honestly, I can’t give them one.

All three are exercise. Exercise in general already helps long term low back pain at moderate certainty. So before you even reach the branding on the studio door, you’re choosing between three flavours of a thing that broadly works ^[17].

The head to head data are thin. There isn’t a single decent trial that puts yoga, tai chi, and Pilates in the same room against each other. So if someone tells you their style beat the other two, they’re guessing. What each one has is its own evidence and, more usefully, its own emphasis. Let’s take them in turn.

Tai chi

Tai chi is the slow one. Chinese in origin, all flowing, weight shifting, deliberate movements. The stuff you’ve seen old fellas doing in a park at dawn, and probably underestimated. It looks gentle, it’s deceptively good for you, and in the conditions our readers care about, it quietly out evidences both of the others.

Fibromyalgia first. A twelve week tai chi programme produced a meaningful improvement against an education and stretching control, with the gains still there six months on. A separate trial then did the comparison everyone should do more often, putting tai chi against aerobic exercise head to head. Tai chi came out ahead on overall fibromyalgia impact, with the longer programmes beating the shorter ones. That’s tai chi against aerobic exercise, not against yoga, so don’t read it as yoga losing. But it’s a real comparison against an active rival, which is rarer in this literature than it should be ^[11]^[12].

This next bit matters for anyone working with bendy bodies. Tai chi has decent evidence for balance and for proprioception, which is your sense of where your joints are without looking. Pooled data show it cuts falls in older adults, both how likely you are to fall and how often. The more people practised, the better it got.

I’d not oversell that one. There’s a publication bias flag on the fall numbers, so it’s “reduces falls”, not “bulletproofs you against gravity”. But the signal is there ^[13]. It’s also been shown to sharpen lower limb proprioception in older adults ^[14].

Why does that matter for you? Poor proprioception is one of the defining things we see in those with hypermobility. They don’t get a clear signal about where the joint is, so they overshoot. A practice that quietly trains joint position sense is, on paper at least, aimed at exactly the right target.

Pilates

Pilates is the control one. A 20th century system built by Joseph Pilates, more or less obsessed with the core and the trunk holding everything steady while the limbs do the moving. It’s a system I personally have a lot of time for, once you take the gimmicky end out of it.

For low back pain, a Cochrane review, later reprinted in the journal Spine, landed on low to moderate certainty that Pilates beats doing very little, with medium sized effects and no convincing evidence it beats other exercise ^[15]^[16]. It’s the same shape as the yoga story. Better than nothing, no special edge over exercise in general.

So why might I nudge a hypermobile reader towards it over a bog standard yoga class? Not because it’s magic. Because of the emphasis. Pilates trains control through a stable trunk instead of chasing how far you can reach, and a loose joint gets on far better with control than with more range. The stability side of all this is where we live, and we go into it properly in our hypermobility core exercises piece.

Where they overlap, and where they differ

Here’s the part worth keeping. The overlap first. All three are gentle to moderate movement. All three beat doing nothing. None of them has convincingly beaten plain old exercise. And all three can help people feel better and move a bit better. So far, so much of a muchness.

The difference is the emphasis, and the emphasis is the whole story once your joints are the problem. Tai chi and Pilates are built around controlled movement and stability. Mainstream yoga, more often than not, is built around range and flexibility, around sinking deeper into the shape. For most bodies, that distinction barely matters. For a hypermobile one, it’s the entire ballgame, and it sets up everything in the next two sections.

If you’ve ever quietly wondered whether being bendy is even the gift everyone keeps telling you it is, read our piece on whether you can be hypermobile but not flexible next to this one.

How the evidence has changed over time

A few decades ago yoga trials barely existed. Now there are hundreds. One review did nothing but count and map them, tallying 312 yoga randomised controlled trials and charting the field swell from almost nothing into a large, scattered literature across many conditions and countries.

More trials, you’d hope, means more answers. But volume and quality aren’t the same thing. That gap is the single biggest problem under the whole yoga evidence base. Once you’ve seen it, you’ll spot it in every “yoga fixed my X” headline going ^[18].

It’s the control group problem, or the “sham yoga” problem if you want the nickname. When the comparison groups in yoga trials were looked at properly, a large share of them turned out to compare yoga against a wait list or “usual care”. Which is just against doing nothing much, in plain terms.

One group gets a pleasant, supervised class in a nice room, with other people, and an hour of someone paying attention. The other group waits at home. The first lot do better, of course they do. The trouble is you can’t then separate the yoga itself from the attention, the expectation, the getting out the house, and the lift of moving your body in company ^[19].

The deeper snag runs further still. You can’t blind anyone to whether they’re doing yoga. With a pill, you slip one group a dummy and nobody’s the wiser. But there’s no placebo downward dog, and you know perfectly well you’re doing yoga.

So a true placebo is basically impossible. The sensible workaround is comparing yoga against an equally engaging active activity instead of against nothing, and that gets used far less than it should. When trials do use a proper active comparator, the effect sizes tend to shrink.

That’s the caveat humming under this whole post, so I’ll say it straight. A lot of yoga’s apparent benefit is measured against doing nothing, and “better than nothing” is a far lower bar than “better than the alternatives” ^[19].

Two broader trends stand out. The field keeps consolidating into big reviews of reviews that land, again and again, on the same verdict. Probably helpful, certainty low. The trials have multiplied faster than they’ve improved.

The harms reporting is also slowly growing up. Older trials hardly mentioned adverse events at all. One Cochrane review of mind and body therapies for fibromyalgia flagged that its included studies reported no adverse events, which almost certainly means nobody was counting properly rather than that yoga is risk free. More recent work, like the national survey of what actually goes wrong, gives a far more honest picture.

So the trajectory is more trials, better syntheses, stubbornly low certainty, and a harms picture that’s slowly stopping pretending nothing ever happens ^[4][22][10].

Yoga and fibromyalgia

Now the specifics. If you’ve got fibromyalgia and you’ve ever googled yoga, you’ve almost certainly tripped over one particular study without realising it had a name. The “Yoga of Awareness” trial. That’s the one everyone cites.

Gentle, multimodal stuff. Soft poses, meditation, breathing, a bit of coping instruction, group discussion. All of it run over eight weeks, with the comparison group parked on a wait list. The yoga group improved more on pain, fatigue, mood, pain catastrophising, and acceptance. On the FIQR pain item, pain dropped about a quarter. Daily diary fatigue dropped roughly a quarter. On the FIQ depression subscale, scores improved by roughly 40%. A follow up paper said the gains held up partly a few months later, and that the wait list group got similar improvements once they finally did the programme too. On the face of it, a win ^[20]^[21].

The catch is a big one, though. This trial is far thinner than its fame lets on. It was a pilot. Fifty three people, all women, at one centre. The comparison was a wait list, which is the exact “against doing nothing” weakness we just spent a whole section picking apart.

So those headline percentages are versus sitting on a waiting list rather than versus another active treatment. The benefits also faded a bit over the follow up, with people dropping out partway through being a well known headache across yoga and fibromyalgia trials generally. None of that makes the study rubbish. But it makes it a promising little pilot against a weak comparator, which is a very different thing from the slam dunk it usually gets sold as ^[19]^[20]^[21].

What do the bigger reviews say? A Cochrane review of mind and body therapies in fibromyalgia found low quality evidence of helpful effects on physical functioning, pain, and mood against usual care. It rated the movement therapies bucket, which is the one yoga lives in, at very low certainty.

A more recent review puts it in sharper perspective, and honestly, it stings a bit if you’re a yoga fan. Across all the mind body approaches, tai chi and qi gong had the most consistent benefits for fatigue, function, and mood. Only two yoga studies even made the cut. Two. The search for decent yoga fibromyalgia trials to include turned up a grand total of two. So within mind body approaches to fibromyalgia, yoga’s specific evidence base is smaller and weaker than tai chi’s, full stop ^[22]^[23].

And where does the official guidance land? The European league’s recommendations for managing fibromyalgia gave a strong recommendation to only one thing, which was exercise. Mind body approaches, yoga among them, only got weaker, conditional recommendations. The clearest signal in fibromyalgia is “move your body”. The particular wrapper you put around the movement matters less than the fact that you’re doing it at all ^[24].

So what’s the practical read for someone with fibromyalgia? When it comes to the yoga that’s actually been tested, it’s gentle and multimodal, not vigorous and not hot. The course in the trials ran around eight weeks. The effect is real but modest. The certainty is low. And tai chi currently has the stronger mind body evidence in this condition.

If you genuinely enjoy gentle yoga and it helps you keep moving and sleeping a bit better, it’s a sensible part of the mix. Just don’t expect it to be the thing that cures fibromyalgia, because nothing in the literature supports that ^[20]^[21]^[23]^[24]. We go deeper into managing the condition itself in our living with fibromyalgia guide, and on the stretching question specifically, our piece on fibromyalgia and stretching covers ground that’s directly relevant here.

One more honest note. Pain in fibromyalgia is driven heavily by a sensitised nervous system rather than by tissue damage you can stretch out. If you want that mechanism in detail, we lay it out in what causes chronic pain in fibromyalgia and hypermobility. It’s part of why gentle, calming, regular movement can take the edge off. And part of why no single posture is going to be the fix. Pacing, how much you do, matters at least as much as what you do. That’s its own subject, covered in our pacing guide.

Yoga and hypermobility

This is the section people actually came for, and it’s the thinnest of the lot. There’s essentially no good quality trial of yoga specifically in hypermobility, hEDS, or hypermobility spectrum disorder. None worth hanging a recommendation on. And it isn’t just yoga either, the broader hypermobility exercise literature is itself limited.

A systematic review of therapeutic exercise for joint hypermobility syndrome concluded that people do improve with exercise, but that there’s no convincing evidence for any specific type, nor even clear proof that exercise beats a control. A review of physiotherapy in hEDS reached much the same place, finding limited and heterogeneous evidence.

So anyone who tells you “yoga is proven to help EDS” or “yoga is proven to harm EDS” is overselling a literature that isn’t there yet. We have to reason from the next best thing, which is mechanism and the closest related evidence ^[28]^[30].

First, the diagnostic ground, briefly. Hypermobile EDS and hypermobility spectrum disorders are clinical diagnoses with no single confirmatory test. They’re defined within the 2017 international EDS classification and described clinically in the literature that followed. Generalised joint hypermobility is commonly screened with the Beighton score, which is a nine point scale. The earlier Brighton criteria for benign joint hypermobility syndrome were largely superseded by that 2017 framework.

Two features keep coming up clinically. Impaired proprioception, a poorer sense of where the joints are. And a tendency to move joints into extreme end ranges. Together, those two explain the whole concern ^[25][26][27].

The actual mechanism of concern

The worry with yoga and hypermobility isn’t “yoga is bad”. It’s far more specific than that. A deep yoga posture asks you to reach the full expression of a shape, to get deeper, to sink further into the stretch. For most bodies, a muscle reaches its limit and that’s the natural stop.

For a hypermobile body, though, the joint just keeps travelling, well past where the muscle can govern it, until you arrive at the end of the joint’s range. At end range, the load stops being carried by muscle, and starts being carried by the passive structures. Which are the ligaments and the joint capsule.

That’s a problem. Ligaments are passive structures. They connect bone to bone and restrain motion. They don’t contract, and they don’t generate force the way muscle does.

So when you repeatedly sink a hypermobile joint into its end range with little muscular control, you’re effectively hanging on the ligaments. You get into the posture, and it might even look impressive from the outside. But you’re achieving the shape by sacrificing stability rather than by building it. For a joint that’s already loose, and already short on the proprioceptive feedback that would warn it, that’s the wrong lesson to keep teaching ^[27]^[29].

This is exactly why the physiotherapy rationale for managing hypermobility emphasises muscle strengthening, proprioceptive and motor control training, and joint protection, rather than chasing more range. The Ehlers-Danlos Society’s own physiotherapy guidance points the same way. Strengthen the stabilising muscles, train control, and be cautious about repeated or excessive stretching and high impact activity when strength and joint control aren’t yet up to it.

That’s organisational guidance rather than a trial, so the scientific weight properly rests on the mechanism and the management literature. But it’s notable that the people who specialise in this are not, on the whole, sending those with hypermobility off to chase deeper stretches ^[27][29]. This is the heart of how we approach things, and it’s set out in full in our exercise and rehabilitation for hypermobility guide and in part one of our hypermobility and exercise series.

Strengthen it, don’t just stretch it

So what’s the strongest direct evidence we’ve got? It comes from the shoulder. A trial in around a hundred people with hypermobility spectrum disorder or hEDS and long standing shoulder symptoms compared sixteen weeks of heavy, high load strengthening against light, low load exercise. The high load strengthening produced the bigger improvement in shoulder function, while being both feasible and safe. That’s the “load it, don’t just mobilise it” headline, and it lines up neatly with the whole strengthen over stretch argument ^[31].

Now the honest hedge. The one year follow up of that same trial found the gap between the groups had closed, with both groups improved and essentially converged by twelve months. So the defensible claim is “high load strengthening is feasible, safe, and better in the short term”, rather than “high load is permanently superior forever”. Both approaches helped over the long run.

What it reinforces is the broader, more reliable point. Active strengthening and control beat passive range work as a target. Stretching a loose joint into more range was never the goal. Teaching the muscles to own the range you already have, is ^{[28][29][31][32]}. There’s more on the stretching myth specifically in our piece on the stretching truth for hypermobility.

The hot yoga question

Then there’s hot yoga, and this one deserves its own warning. Hot or Bikram style yoga is practised in a heated room, commonly somewhere around 40 to 42 degrees. When heated yoga, at 40 degrees, was compared with the same yoga at room temperature, the heat produced a greater acute increase in hip range of motion.

But the paper’s authors flag in their discussion that pushing acute range of motion in heat raises mechanical concerns, particularly for people whose joints already move further than the norm. For a hypermobile joint, that’s a problem. Heat lets the joint move even further with even less protective resistance, and that’s the wrong incentive for a body whose joints already travel too far too easily ^[33].

The hedge matters here too. That was a small acute physiology study in healthy participants, not a hypermobility outcome study. So the right word is “mechanistically concerning”, rather than “proven to cause harm”. Nobody has run the trial where they put a room full of hypermobile people through a year of Bikram and counted the injuries.

But you don’t always need that trial to make a sensible call. When the mechanism, the management literature, and the specialist guidance all point the same way, deliberately adding heat to push a loose joint deeper into range is a gamble with very little upside for this group ^[33].

So where does that leave yoga for those with hypermobility?

Roughly here. When it comes to yoga and a loose joint, the honest position is a careful one. Yoga has not been properly tested in hypermobility. Nobody can honestly promise you it helps, and nobody can honestly promise you it harms either.

What we can say with reasonable confidence is that the mechanism and the related evidence all favour building strength and control over chasing range. That doesn’t put yoga off the table. It means the version that makes sense for a hypermobile body is the opposite of what most classes celebrate. Less reaching for the deepest expression of a pose, more holding a stable, controlled, muscularly active position well inside your end range. Skip the party trick postures that show off how far you can bend, because for you that’s not a strength, it’s the risk. And give hot yoga a wide berth ^[27]^[28]^[29]^[30]^[31]^[32]^[33].

If that sounds like a lot of caveats, well, it is, and that’s the honest state of the evidence rather than us being difficult. The thing to take away is the same thing we say about almost everything. When it comes to hypermobility, the goal is a joint that’s controlled and strong through its range, rather than a joint that can be pushed past it. Whatever movement practice gets you there is a good one. A class that keeps daring you to go deeper, possibly not.

For the full picture of how we put all this together, the hypermobility and Ehlers-Danlos guide is the place to start.

The bottom line

So, where does all of this leave you and your yoga mat? Yoga is a genuinely useful movement practice with a long and interesting history, a real but modest evidence base, and far less magic than the marketing claims.

For back pain, it holds up about as well as other exercise ^[5]^[9]. For fibromyalgia, it may help a bit, though tai chi currently has the stronger hand ^[23]^[24]. For hypermobility, the honest answer is that we’re reasoning from mechanism, because the direct evidence barely exists. That mechanism points firmly towards building strength and control, rather than reaching for the deepest stretch ^[27]^[29]^[31].

If you love your yoga, none of this is a reason to stop. It’s a reason to do it with your eyes open. Choose stability over party tricks. Skip the heated room if your joints are loose. And remember that the best thing you can do for a hypermobile joint is teach the muscles around it to do their job. Do that, and yoga can absolutely have a place.

We’re always in your corner, and if you want a hand putting the strength and control side of this into practice, that’s exactly what we do in the studios.

References

Singleton, M. (2010) Yoga Body: The Origins of Modern Posture Practice. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195395341.
Mallinson, J. and Singleton, M. (2017) Roots of Yoga. London: Penguin Classics. ISBN 9780241253045.
Birch, J. and Hargreaves, J. (2023) Premodern Yogasanas and Modern Postural Yoga Practice: Distinct Regional Collections of Asanas on the Eve of Colonialism. Journal of Yoga Studies, 4, pp. 31-82. doi: 10.34000/joys.2023.v4.01
Wang, F., Yang, W., Wang, C. et al. (2025) Yoga and chronic diseases: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Medical Review, 5(3), pp. 244-255. doi: 10.1515/mr-2024-0078
Wieland, L.S., Skoetz, N., Pilkington, K. et al. (2017) Yoga treatment for chronic non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(1), CD010671. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010671.pub2
Cramer, H., Lauche, R., Langhorst, J. and Dobos, G. (2013) Yoga for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Depression and Anxiety, 30(11), pp. 1068-1083. doi: 10.1002/da.22166
Cramer, H., Lauche, R., Haller, H. et al. (2015) A systematic review of yoga for heart disease. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 22(3), pp. 284-295. doi: 10.1177/2047487314523132
Riley, K.E. and Park, C.L. (2015) How does yoga reduce stress? A systematic review of mechanisms of change and guide to future inquiry. Health Psychology Review, 9(3), pp. 379-396. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2014.981778
Tankha, H., Gaskins, D., Shallcross, A. et al. (2024) Effectiveness of Virtual Yoga for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Network Open, 7(11), e2442339. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.42339
Cramer, H., Quinker, D., Schumann, D. et al. (2019) Adverse effects of yoga: a national cross-sectional survey. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 19(1), 190. doi: 10.1186/s12906-019-2612-7
Wang, C., Schmid, C.H., Rones, R. et al. (2010) A Randomized Trial of Tai Chi for Fibromyalgia. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(8), pp. 743-754. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912611
Wang, C., Schmid, C.H., Fielding, R.A. et al. (2018) Effect of tai chi versus aerobic exercise for fibromyalgia: comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial. BMJ, 360, k851. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k851
Huang, Z.-G., Feng, Y.-H., Li, Y.-H. and Lv, C.-S. (2017) Systematic review and meta-analysis: Tai Chi for preventing falls in older adults. BMJ Open, 7(2), e013661. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013661
Zou, L., Han, J., Li, C. et al. (2019) Effects of Tai Chi on Lower Limb Proprioception in Adults Aged Over 55: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 100(6), pp. 1102-1113. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.425
Yamato, T.P., Maher, C.G., Saragiotto, B.T. et al. (2015) Pilates for low back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015(7), CD010265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd010265.pub2
Yamato, T.P., Maher, C.G., Saragiotto, B.T. et al. (2016) Pilates for Low Back Pain: Complete Republication of a Cochrane Review. Spine, 41(12), pp. 1013-1021. doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001398
Hayden, J.A., Ellis, J., Ogilvie, R. et al. (2021) Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2021(9), CD009790. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009790.pub2
Cramer, H., Lauche, R. and Dobos, G. (2014) Characteristics of randomized controlled trials of yoga: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 14(1), 328. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-328
Park, C.L., Groessl, E., Maiya, M. et al. (2014) Comparison groups in yoga research: A systematic review and critical evaluation of the literature. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 22(5), pp. 920-929. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2014.08.008
Carson, J.W., Carson, K.M., Jones, K.D. et al. (2010) A pilot randomized controlled trial of the Yoga of Awareness program in the management of fibromyalgia. Pain, 151(2), pp. 530-539. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.08.020
Carson, J.W., Carson, K.M., Jones, K.D., Mist, S.D. and Bennett, R.M. (2012) Follow-up of Yoga of Awareness for Fibromyalgia: Results at 3 Months and Replication in the Wait-List Group. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 28(9), pp. 804-813. doi: 10.1097/ajp.0b013e31824549b5
Theadom, A., Cropley, M., Smith, H.E., Feigin, V.L. and McPherson, K. (2015) Mind and body therapy for fibromyalgia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015(4), CD001980. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001980.pub3
Steen, J.P., Kannan, V., Zaidi, A., Cramer, H. and Ng, J.Y. (2024) Mind-body therapy for treating fibromyalgia: a systematic review. Pain Medicine, 25(12), pp. 703-737. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnae076
Macfarlane, G.J., Kronisch, C., Dean, L.E. et al. (2017) EULAR revised recommendations for the management of fibromyalgia. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 76(2), pp. 318-328. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209724
Malfait, F., Francomano, C., Byers, P. et al. (2017) The 2017 international classification of the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 175(1), pp. 8-26. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31552
Tinkle, B., Castori, M., Berglund, B. et al. (2017) Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (a.k.a. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Type III and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type): Clinical description and natural history. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 175(1), pp. 48-69. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31538
Engelbert, R.H.H., Juul-Kristensen, B., Pacey, V. et al. (2017) The evidence-based rationale for physical therapy treatment of children, adolescents, and adults diagnosed with joint hypermobility syndrome/hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 175(1), pp. 158-167. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31545
Palmer, S., Bailey, S., Barker, L., Barney, L. and Elliott, A. (2014) The effectiveness of therapeutic exercise for joint hypermobility syndrome: a systematic review. Physiotherapy, 100(3), pp. 220-227. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2013.09.002
Russek, L.N., Stott, P. and Simmonds, J. (2019) Recognizing and Effectively Managing Hypermobility-Related Conditions. Physical Therapy, 99(9), pp. 1189-1200. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz078
Reychler, G., De Backer, M.-M., Piraux, E., Poncin, W. and Caty, G. (2021) Physical therapy treatment of hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: A systematic review. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 185(10), pp. 2986-2994. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62393
Liaghat, B., Skou, S.T., Sondergaard, J. et al. (2022) Short-term effectiveness of high-load compared with low-load strengthening exercise on self-reported function in patients with hypermobile shoulders: a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 56(22), pp. 1269-1276. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105223
Liaghat, B., Juul-Kristensen, B., Faber, D.A. et al. (2024) One-year effectiveness of high-load compared with low-load strengthening exercise on self-reported function in patients with hypermobile shoulders: a secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 58(7), pp. 373-381. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-107563
Lambert, B.S. et al. (2020) Acute Physiologic Effects of Performing Yoga in The Heat on Energy Expenditure, Range of Motion, and Inflammatory Biomarkers. International Journal of Exercise Science, 13(3), pp. 802-817. doi: 10.70252/akmz9424